Send the same research question to several models and compare the answers, ground them with live web search, and use Debate to surface what's missing. A research pattern that never rests on a single source.
Relying on one person and one model for research tends to hide gaps and stale information.
Line up several models' answers side by side in Compare to surface gaps and disagreements.
Toggle Web Search on and each model's built-in search grounds the answer in current information.
Register internal reports as knowledge, and Chat, Compare, and Debate can all ground answers in it.
Debate assigns opposing roles to argue both sides, ending with a Red Team rebuttal pass.
Open Compare and send the same research topic to multiple models. Example: "Summarize pricing trends for SMB-focused SaaS in Japan."
Turn on Web Search so each model answers with current information.
Register past research reports and internal documents as knowledge so comparisons are grounded in evidence.
Hand the comparison over to Debate and have opposing roles argue it out. Example: "List three risks in this pricing strategy."
Summarize the key points in Chat and save it as an artifact you can search across later.
Send the same question to several models and see the answers side by side.
Toggle provider-native search on for answers grounded in current information.
Upload research material so Chat, Compare, and Debate can ground answers in it.
Argue a question through multiple roles, ending with a Red Team rebuttal.
Carry a Compare result straight into Debate or Chat.
Research results are auto-saved as artifacts, searchable by type and status.

Try the research and planning pattern on the free plan.
Start free