From design debate to code, in one line.
Debate a design decision, then carry the agreed direction straight into code generation in Chat. Cross Review adds a second model's eyes to the result.
Where this helps
Design decisions come down to personal preference
Debate assigns roles to argue both sides and ends with a Red Team rebuttal before you decide.
Code review depends on one person
Cross Review has a second model independently review the generated code.
Design docs and code end up scattered
Artifacts are auto-detected and auto-saved, with Series and Version tracking.
Turning review notes into a document takes time
Generated material can be downloaded as PowerPoint (.pptx), Word, or Excel.
From design to review
Debate the design decision
Example: "Should this feature be split into a microservice, or stay in the monolith?" — argue it across multiple roles.
Carry the conclusion into Chat
Hand the Debate outcome straight to Chat and generate an implementation plan or code that follows it.
Have a second model cross review it
Send the generated code or design doc to Cross Review. Example: "Point out any missing edge cases in this code."
Save it as an artifact
Reviewed design docs and code are auto-saved as artifacts with Series and Version tracking.
Switch models when it helps
Switch models mid-conversation to match the strengths you need for a given part of the implementation.
Features you'll use
Debate
Argue a design decision across up to five roles and three debate algorithms.
Cross Review
Available in every mode — have a second model independently review the output.
Artifact management
Auto-detected, auto-saved, versioned with Series/Version, and searchable across the workspace.
PowerPoint generation
Download generated material as PowerPoint (.pptx), Word, or Excel.
Model switching
Switch models mid-conversation.
Knowledge
Turn past design docs into knowledge for grounding.
Related pages
Try the engineering pattern on the free plan.
Start free